know

IPA: nˈoʊ

(rare) Knowledge; the state of knowing.
Knowledge; the state of knowing. (Now confined to the fixed phrase in the know.)
Alternative form of knowe (“hill, knoll”) [(chiefly Scotland and Ulster) A small hill; a knoll.]

(transitive) To perceive the truth or factuality of; to be certain of or that; to correctly believe with justified confidence via reliable methods.
(intransitive) To be or become aware or cognizant.
(transitive) To be aware of; to be cognizant of.
(intransitive, obsolete) To be acquainted (with another person).
(transitive) To be acquainted or familiar with; to have encountered.
(transitive, archaic, biblical, euphemistic) To have sexual relations with. This meaning normally specified in modern English as e.g. to ’know someone in the biblical sense’ or to ‘know biblically.’
(transitive) To experience.
To understand or have a grasp of through experience or study.
(transitive) To be able to distinguish, to discern, particularly by contrast or comparison; to recognize the nature of.
(transitive) To recognize as the same (as someone or something previously encountered) after an absence or change.
(intransitive) To have knowledge; to have information, be informed.
(transitive) To be able to play or perform (a song or other piece of music).
(transitive) To have indexed and have information about within one's database.

Examples of "know" in Sentences

“So you know that I know what you know what is it you want?”
We don\'t know because we don\'t want to know\ 'which passes for visionary in America circa 2009.
I do know that those who say there will be no more warming are flying in the face of what we *know*.
For the person offering the service though, I think it is key to know in your mind – to * know* – that you are the best at what you do.
Before I go I'd like to wish anyone reading this a great holiday season, and let you know how much I've enjoyed getting to *know* so many of you this year.
With most endeavors which require knowledge and experience, a group will always know more than any one single individual, and many groups together will always know more than any one single Team.
Thus in ˜You know Socrates approaching™, the predicate ˜know Socrates approaching™ appellates its concept, the ratio ˜Socrates approaching™, so the proposition is false unless you are aware who it is; whereas in
It is explained by reason of the fact that the predicate appellates its form (for ˜You know Socrates approaching™ requires that the predicate ˜know Socrates approaching™ be true of you and so is false), whereas ˜Socrates approaching you know™ requires only that ˜Him you know™ be true, referring to Socrates, and it is true.