trinitarian
IPA: trˈɪnʌtˈɛriʌn
Root Word: Trinitarian
noun
- Someone who believes in the Trinity, the three persons of the Godhead.
- A member of the Trinitarian order.
- Alternative form of Trinitarian [Someone who believes in the Trinity, the three persons of the Godhead.]
adjective
- Believing in the Trinity.
- Of or pertaining to the Trinity (the three persons of the Godhead) or to the doctrine of Trinity.
- (uncommon) Of or pertaining to a trinity, a group of three (almost exclusively when compared to the Christian Trinity).
- Alternative form of Trinitarian [Believing in the Trinity.]
Advertisement
Examples of "trinitarian" in Sentences
- Trinitarianism is not the only issue.
- No Trinitarian will disagree with that.
- The Trinitarians prevailed in the discussion.
- Branham was not not a oneness or a trinitarian.
- Certainly they disagree with the trinitarian view.
- Christianity is a monotheistic trinitarian religion.
- Trinitarianism is not a prerequisite to be Christian.
- Chapter 10 articulates a "trinitarian" process theology.
- Trinitarians construe this to be an indication of the Trinity.
- And of course there is the invention of Christmas and Trinitarianism.
- The two men proclaim loudly that the Godhead is not trinitarian and escape.
- Prussian was that Clausewitz's ideas of 'trinitarian' warfare were outmoded in the modern era.
- It is crucial to note that 'trinitarian' as an adjective is not used at any point by Clausewitz in
- In other words, there is no doubt that it is possible to read the Gospel of John as a "trinitarian" document in the later Nicene sense.
- Trinity and treat this so-called trinitarian view as a very negligible quantity, yet, rightly considered, this is the only view that can satisfy.
- He demonstrates the profound problems to put it as kindly as possible with the PJP II's major pre-papal theological writings, and with his "trinitarian" encylicals.
- Kostenberger and Swain engage in a "trinitarian" reading of the Gospel, one that, in essence, interprets the Gospel as though the Nicene and Chalcedonian formulations could be presupposed as the text's background.
- There is still no overwhelming consensus on the latter point, mainly as theorising about the present is innately difficult, but most commentators agree that 'trinitarian' warfare persists, despite protestations to the contrary by van Creveld and others.
- Consequently, he regards 'trinitarian' warfare based on his revisionist model as only one type of historical warfare and therefore Clausewitz's theories are, if not obsolete, then at least incapable of explaining the full spectrum of warfare either past or present.
Advertisement
Advertisement